Nikon NX Studio Review: How Good Is This Free Photo Editor?

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Но это полный абсурд. Неужели Хейл никогда не слышал о принципе Бергофского. – Вот что нам надо сделать.  – Стратмор начал спокойно излагать свой план.  – Мы сотрем всю переписку Хейла с Танкадо, уничтожим записи о том, что я обошел систему фильтров, все диагнозы Чатрукьяна относительно «ТРАНСТЕКСТА», все данные о работе компьютера над «Цифровой крепостью», одним словом – .

 
 

Nikon capture nx2 vs lightroom free download. Editing pics with Nikon’s free Capture NX-D – is it worth saving money working with free software?

 
We\’re hiring! I liked the original NX UI better. Its not possible to hardware calibrate a laptop monitor. It stayed with me through the D

 

Nikon capture nx2 vs lightroom free download

 
It\’s made to help you edit everything in one place, and it\’s completely free for download, so let\’s see what you can expect from it. Of course. They instead suggest that users download the latest version of NX Studio. Fortunately, NX Studio is free, so you\’re not left completely in the.

 
 

Nikon capture nx2 vs lightroom free download.Lightroom 3 vs Nikon Capture NX 2

 
 

I find shadow recovery in NX Studio far better than Adobe\’s version and plan to switch to using NX Studio for processing for most of my work. EricBowles Well-known member. I hosted the Nikonians webinar with Vincent Versace last week. He has used Nikon software for the front end of his workflow since the original Capture software.

He believes Studio NX is a very good program as long as you understand that this is the 1. It\’s not perfect, but there are reasonable workarounds. He is starting in Studio NX then finishing in Photoshop or other programs. Lightroom has it\’s place for higher volume work. The ability to apply settings from one image to another or a group of images provides a very nice workflow. But that\’s a different type of editing compared to the fine art images and individual image editing Versace is doing with Studio NX.

Ad Astra said:. Palouse Active member. Hermann said:. Don\’t forget NX is still the first version, and for a first version it\’s already pretty good, like you said. I\’m sure it will turn into a much more polished piece of software quite soon. Palouse said:. This is only true of the current packaging. Elements of NX have been available for almost 20 years. Woodpecker Well-known member Supporting Member. The main thing is that it\’s working based on native NEFs and is thus able to interprete ALL the information in thses files correctly, something that NONE of the third party software is able today.

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter. Ironheart Posts: 3, Moderator. August The test you are performing may not be completely valid. Are you turning off both luminance and color noise in LR? A more valid test would be how good you can make it. Try optimizing both and see which program can generate the best photo. I think you will be surprised. You will be surprised all over again. You may find that ISO is no longer the ceiling for your D I think I shall have to just bite the bullet and get to grips with Photoshop.

Learning one program will at my advanced stage in life be easier than learning several I expect although I am acutely aware that PS is a powerhouse and with that comes a lot of information to digest. Thanks once again for your time and trouble responding to my question. It is much appreciated.

Sorry Curt, just just sounds like way to much work. Lightroom, after a fashion, still uses the folder hierarchy system within Lightroom. Aperture will allow either a managed or referenced library.

In the managed library, images are not made available outside of Aperture. This prevents accidentally deleting or moving an image. Or, Aperture can use a referenced library. In which case your images are available using whatever folder hierarchy you would like.

In either case, the hierarchy isn\’t really seen within Aperture. In any case, I think I would rather use one program to manage images. Steve, If you do go for Photoshop, remember that the accompanying application, Bridge, does a good job of finding your files — IF you have the files themselves organized in a logical hierarchy ies.

For me, the task of getting those into Aperture or Lightroom would have been redundant at best, since I could access the folders formerly boxes in Bridge and call them right into PS as needed. Bridge has multiple tools for management- renaming files, marking them for \’quality\’, editing metadata, etc. JDMvW , Mar 17, Most of LR\’s value is in the Library and the Develop modules. Bridge gives you the organization, metadata edits, etc.

The current Adobe RAW processing Process Version is so powerful that you don\’t even need to go to Photoshop anymore in most situations. By right-clicking on a file in Bridge, by the way, you can open virtually any image jpg, etc. Photo Mechanic is a wonderful tool — I\’ve continued to use it for close to a decade in spite of also having LR, Extensis Portfolio and numerous other file handling tools available at the press of a key.

However, PM is for image ingestion, astonishing feats of keyword manipulation, etc. However, it has essentially no capabilities for serious image search and retrieval, and certainly no serious image adjustment capability. In live music photography, capturing lights in the frame is not only inevitable, it\’s often desirable.

With their singular saturation, these gelled incandescent PAR lights or LEDs are a surefire way to blow a color channel with a digital sensor.

Let\’s look at how Capture NX 2 and Lightroom 3 handle this common effect in live music. While the RAW conversion of both images is very close as seen in the full frame of Aerosmith\’s Steven Tyler , this detail of defocused lights shows the subtle difference between the two in the rendition of mono-color light sources. Again, this comparison shows a very close rendition between Capture NX 2 and Lightroom 3 beta. Skintones look very similar, while the starkest difference in the overall image is increased saturation in the smoke behind Lil Wayne.

Even then, the overall rendition is extremely close. To my eye, the Lightroom 3 file has a very slightly finer look in comparison to NX 2, while Nikon\’s profile with NX 2 has a slightly deeper contrast. Both Capture NX 2 and Lightroom 3 are set to default sharpening.

For image quality, my preference is for the latter, which will enlarge more cleanly for larger prints. At ISO , things get a little more interesting. I always prefer to shoot without noise reduction in-camera, as I feel that image quality is best when NR is performed in RAW conversion or in post-processing.

As you can see from this example crop, the Capture NX 2 crop is much more gritty in appearance, while Lightroom 3 renders a much finer noise pattern.